Last night I had a revolutionary experience in the “Twitterverse” as I participated in my first live Twitter chat. As I am sure many other Twitter novices can relate to, the idea of tweeting can sometimes be intimidating in the sense of “why should anyone care about what I have to say?” My tweets are often inconsistent (sometimes I will tweet 10 times in a day and forget to log-in again until four days later) and a lot of my tweets are highly conversational, applying only to the person I mention in the tweet.
Last night I learned how Twitter can truly be used in an effective communications manner. With a live Twitter chat, you can target a single niche group about a specific topic that everyone involved would like to discuss. Live Twitter chats are cool because you can receive valuable information about one topic, rather than finding your Twitterfeed flooded with random, unconnected information (which is often a good way to explore and learn but not so conducive to time management!)
So for those of you who are unfamiliar with the concept, I will explain how this “chat” worked. The conversation led by @PRStudChat, a Twitter account that leads conversations between public relations students, educators and professionals. The account was created by public relations practitioners Deirdre Breakenridge (@dbreakenridge) and Valerie Simon (@ValerieSimon). The group invites influential speakers to participate in the scheduled chats (last night it was Chris Brogan, a public relations and advertising guru) and everyone tweets to the same hashtag: #prstudchat. @PRStudChat would tweet public relations questions about every seven minutes, and everyone participating could tweet their responses, reply to others or retweet strong answers.
I have to admit that I was a little hesitant on my first attempt, but after seeing how it flowed, I will be better prepared to jump into the conversation on my next live Twitter chat. One thing that I plan to do next time before I join a live Twitter chat is look into the topic that will be discussed so that I can contribute more developed answers and commentary.
When it comes down to it, you have 140 characters to respond, so you must be short and sweet. While I was skeptical of the idea before I participated, simply because it seems challenging to have a meaningful conversation when your words are strictly limited, it turned out that people produced poignant, thought-provoking answers, which in effect, spurred further discussion. I’m still all for a good ol’ fashion face-to-face discussion over coffee, but this allows you to speak to thought leaders around the globe who probably can’t meet you at your local Starbucks. Overall, my advice to you is to give it a try!






